Reforming The Enforcement Of Post-Divorce Maintenance Orders: A Comparative Study Of Indonesia And The United States

Penulis

  • M. Holil UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Junaidi Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember image/svg+xml
  • Muhammad Faisol Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/trqgsc13

Kata Kunci:

penegakan kewajiban nafkah; hak pasca-perceraian; pengadilan agama; pelanggaran perintah pengadilan (perdata); studi perbandingan hukum.

Abstrak

This study aims to analyse the limitations in the enforcement of post-divorce maintenance orders in Indonesia and to propose a legal reform through the limited adoption of the civil contempt mechanism from the United States. Employing a normative legal methodology with a statutory and comparative law approach, this study examines primary and secondary legal sources. The results of the analysis indicate that the problem in Indonesia is not the complete absence of legal instruments, but rather the lack of adequate noncriminal enforcement instruments for periodic claims, as well as the weaknesses of passive enforcement based on executorial beslag. Through a comparative normative analysis, it was found that the doctrine of civil contempt in the United States provides compliancebased enforcement instruments, such as conditional coercive detention orders, wage garnishment and the suspension of administrative licences, which can be adapted into religious civil procedure law whilst taking into account the limitations of the national legal system and the principles of Maqasid al-Shariah. This research contributes a model for normative legal reform to strengthen the effectiveness of post-divorce rights enforcement in Indonesia.

Referensi

Alamsyah, Asrianti Sukirman, Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas, and Aden Rosadi. ‘Islamic Judicial Activism in Determining Child Maintenance: Ex Officio Authority and Peaceful Settlement in Indonesian Religious Courts’. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 10, no. 2 (2025): 671–99. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i2.12755.

Authority Network America. ‘Contempt of Court in Family Law: Enforcement and Penaltiesan Dan Sanksi’, n.d. https://doi.org/https://nationalfamilylawauthority.com/contempt-of-court-family-law/.

Bagenda, Christina, Wira Okta Viana, and Liza Utama. ‘Tinjauan Normatif Terhadap Mekanisme Eksekusi Perkara Perdata Di Luar Pulau Jawa Dan Madura Berdasarkan Rbg Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman Tinjauan Normatif Terhadap Mekanisme Eksekusi Perkara Perdata Di Luar Pulau Jawa’. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 8, no. 12 (2025): 8755–62. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i12.8405.

Connecticut Judicial Branch, Superior Court Operations, and Law Library Services Unit Judge Support Services. ‘Motion for Contempt in Family Matters’. Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut, 2025, 1–45. https://doi.org/https://www.jud.ct.gov/lawlib/Notebooks/Pathfinders/Contempt.pdf.

Costanzo, Molly A., Lisa Klein Vogel, Aaron Reilly, and Alexis M. Dennis. ‘Frequency of License Suspension and Civil Contempt in Child Support’. Journal of Policy Practice and Research 7, no. 2 (26 February 2026): 109–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42972-026-00139-5.

Dewi Oktavia, Imron Rosidi, and Sofia Hardani. ‘When Judgments Are Not Enough: Enforcement, Legal Culture, and Substantive Justice in Islamic Family Law’. Fikri : Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya 11, no. 1 (2026): 139–53. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v11i1.7477.

Fahmi, Ahsanul, Muhammad Na Sir, Nur Anshari, Aminah, and Mohammad Nurunnabi. ‘JUDICIAL PRACTICES IN ENFORCING POST-DIVORCE MAINTENANCE RIGHTS FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN INDONESIA’. Indonesia Private Law Review 6, no. 2 (24 November 2025): 103–16. https://doi.org/10.25041/IPLR.V6I2.4608.

Fairuza ‘Alima Fardindaputri, Fuat Hasanudin. ‘Legal Protection of Children’s Rights Post-Divorce: A Study of Single Mothers in Malang Regency’ 7, no. 1 (2025): 70–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss1.art4.

Fardindaputri, Fairuza ‘Alima, and Fuat Hasanudin. ‘Legal Protection of Children’s Rights Post-Divorce: A Study of Single Mothers in Malang Regency’. Prophetic Law Review 7, no. 1 (9 July 2025): 70–94. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.VOL7.ISS1.ART4.

Giabardo, Carlo Vittorio. ‘Disobeying Courts’ Orders—A Comparative Analysis of the Civil Contempt of Court Doctrine and of the Imageof the Common Law Judge’. Jurnal Studi Hukum Perdata 10, no. 1 (31 December 2017): 5. https://doi.org/https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/jcls/vol10/iss1/5.

Haris, Ahmad, Edy Lisdiyono, and Setiyowati. ‘The Reconstruction of Religious Court Decision Execution on the Fulfilment of Children’S Rights Post-Divorce in Indonesia’. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental 18, no. 7 (2024): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-035.

———. ‘The Reconstruction of Religious Court Decision Execution on the Fulfilment of Children’s Rights Post-Divorce in Indonesia’. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 18, no. 7 (8 April 2024): e5564. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n7-035.

Harun, Nurlaila, Idrus Hamzah, Faradila Hasan, and Oleksandr Hryza. ‘Beyond Procedural Efficiency: Cumulative Itsbat Nikah, Divorce Litigation, and Women’s Post-Divorce Rights in Indonesia’ 25, no. 2 (2026): 253–64. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v25i2.16638.

Hesti, Yulia, Burhanudin Harahap, and Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni. ‘Economic Vulnerability of Women after Divorce Towards a Gender Responsive Family Law Policy’. Atlantis Press, 29 December 2025, 597–605. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-519-5_47.

Hoecke, Mark Van. ‘Methodology of Comparative Legal Research’. Recht En Methode in Onderzoek En Onderwijs, January 2015, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.5553/REM/.000010.

Idzni Azhani Firdaus et al. ‘Hukum Acara Perdata’. Kultura Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Humaniora 2, no. 4 (2024): 249–58. https://doi.org/http://jurnal.kolibi.org/index.php/kultura.

Jannah, Shofiatul, Nur Sa’adah , Mutiara Sari Dewi, Rizqy Ramadhani Arifin, Sella Anggraeni, and Qowwimatul Aqidah Arifin. ‘IMPLEMENTATION OF POST-DIVORCE ALIMONY POLICIES FROM A GENDER JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE: A Comparative Legal Study of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei Darussalam’. Ulumuna 29, no. 2 (2025): 959–89. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v29i2.1762.

Lestari, Wilda. ‘Ta ’ Zir Crimes in Islamic Criminal Law : Definition Legal Basis Types and Punishments Tindak Pidana Ta ’ Zir Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam : Definisi Dasar Hukum Jenis Dan Hukuman Abstrak 3 . HASIL DAN DISKUSI Pengertian Jarimah Ta ’ Zir’. Al-Qanun 05, no. 1 (2024): 22–32.

Mahkamah Agung RI. ‘SEMA Nomor 2 Tahun 2019’. Bawas, 2019. https://bawas.mahkamahagung.go.id/bawas_doc/doc/sema_02_2019.pdf.

Mohd Yusoff, Rahmawati, Evi Eliyanah, and Ahmad Munjin Nasih. ‘An Analysis Towards Patterns of Violation of Maintenance Rights After Divorce Within Islamic Marriage in Indonesia’. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law 12, no. 3 (2024): 678–88. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no3.707.

Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press, 2020.

Muhammad Zainul Syafaat, Ainol Yaqin, and Amal Kamal Hashem Al-Jayyar. ‘Gap Between Norms and Practices in The Protection of Family Rights after Divorce: A Socio-Legal Study’. Intizar 32, no. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.19109/intizar.v32i1.35059.

Novendri Eka Saputra. ‘Eksekusi Nafkah Anak Sebagai Ultimum Remedium Terhadap Wanprestasi Ayah Biologis Pasca Perceraian Di Peradilan Agama’. Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Pekanbaru, 2026. https://doi.org/https://www.pta-pekanbaru.go.id/57221/eksekusi-nafkah-anak-sebagai-ultimum-remedium-terhadap-wanprestasi-ayah-biologis-pasca-perceraian-di-peradilan-agama.html.

Putri, Dita Elvia Kusuma. ‘Problematika Hukum Terkait Alimony Bagi Mantan Isteri Pns Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Pluralisme Hukum Di Indonesia’. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan 12, no. 2 (2023): 223–39. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v12i2.3265.

Rahayu, Yunita Sri, and Widiya Yul. ‘Problematics in the Implementation of Religious Court Decisions on the Execution of Child Support after Divorce’. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 6, no. 2 (18 February 2025): 1329–42. https://doi.org/10.38035/JLPH.V6I2.3050.

———. ‘Problematics in the Implementation of Religious Court Decisions on the Execution of Child Support after Divorce’. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 6, no. 2 (2026): 1329–42. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i2.3050.

Saifullah, Kholid, Syamsul Huda, Isnain La Harisi, Rizky Kurniawan, Sekolah Tinggi, Dirasat Islamiyah, and Imam Syafi’i. ‘Transforming Post-Divorce Alimony in Indonesian Religious Courts: A Maqashid Al-Sharia Analysis’. Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion 5, no. 1 (1 April 2026): 1075-1084–1075–1084. https://doi.org/10.58421/MISRO.V5I1.1320.

Sausan, Daulika, Zahra Nabila, and ; Marjo. ‘The Issue of Execution Process in Civil Procedure Law in Indonesia’. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 11, no. 5 (7 May 2024): 18–23. https://doi.org/10.18415/IJMMU.V11I5.5772.

Sugiyanto, Agus, Nurul Hamidah, Rini Nur Aini, and Abdurrahman Hakim. ‘Analisis Statistik Tren Perceraian Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Cerai Gugat Dan Cerai Talak Dalam Perspektif Hukum Keluarga’. As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga 8, no. 4 (7 October 2026): 828-841–828–841. https://doi.org/10.47467/AS.V8I4.13543.

Syukrawati, Syukrawati, Imaro Sidqi, Siti Maymanatun Nisa, Zufriani Zufriani, and Doli Witro. ‘Post-Divorce Rights of Women and Children in Pekalongan City, Central Java: Challenges in Islamic Law Analysis’. Al-Ahkam 34, no. 1 (2024): 121–46. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2024.34.1.20624.

Ulfazah, Yernati, Muhammad Hafis, Nia Elmiati, and Asril Amirul Zakariah. ‘The Dynamics of Islamic Family Law in the Modern Era: An Analysis of Taghayyur Al-Fatwā and Al-Muḥāfaẓah in the Changing Marriage Agreement Provisions in Indonesia’. Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum (JSYH) 7, no. 1 (2025): 77–94. https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol7.iss1.art5.

Diterbitkan

2026-10-30

Cara Mengutip

“Reforming The Enforcement Of Post-Divorce Maintenance Orders: A Comparative Study Of Indonesia And The United States”. 2026. Private Law 6 (3): 1274-88. https://doi.org/10.29303/trqgsc13.

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama